Facts About valid marriage pakistani case law Revealed
Facts About valid marriage pakistani case law Revealed
Blog Article
Article 199 of your Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by regulation." It really is very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether These remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Online access to civil and criminal cases in pick circuit courts. Cases could be searched by locality using name, case number, or hearing date.
four. Record shows that the petitioner has become booked in as much as eight criminal cases under the same offence with different complainants and involving sizable amounts of money. These cases span over the years 2018 to 2020 and three cases have been registered after the registration of the instant case. While the petitioner has obtained bail in All those cases, it does, prima facie, set up that the petitioner is vulnerable to repeating the offence.
When there is no prohibition against referring to case legislation from a state other than the state in which the case is being listened to, it holds little sway. Still, if there is not any precedent in the home state, relevant case law from another state could possibly be considered from the court.
139 . Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Offered the legal analysis on the subject issue, we're of your view that the claim with the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally sound, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They are really matter to rules and regulations When the recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case of the petitioners for promotion can be deemed, however, we're apparent within our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health and fitness, subject matter to availability of vacancy matter into the approval from the competent authority.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is additionally a well-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is issue towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings to the evidence.
73 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Bearing on the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 from the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice just isn't served, the grievance petition could be dismissed. This is because service with the grievance notice is actually a mandatory requirement and also a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The law necessitates that a grievance notice be served around the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. In case the employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) Should the organization is transprovincial.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle proven by a court, which other courts are obligated to adhere to.
Accessing free case law sites in Pakistan is essential for legal professionals, students, and everyone seeking to understand Pakistani legal precedents.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Offered the legal analysis on the topic issue, we've been from the view that the claim from the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle will not be legally seem, check here In addition to promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, These are subject matter to rules and regulations if the recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case with the petitioners for promotion could possibly be thought of, however, we are crystal clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be deemed for seniority and promotion as being the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Physical fitness, issue to availability of vacancy subject on the approval with the competent authority.
Preserving Social Order: By imposing strict penalties for murder, Section 302 PPC reinforces the principle of social order and steadiness. It demonstrates the commitment from the state to protect its citizens and copyright the rule of legislation.
this Court is remaining with no option but to direct the respondents to inform the promotion from the petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)
A reduce court might not rule against a binding precedent, even if it feels that it is actually unjust; it could only express the hope that a higher court or perhaps the legislature will reform the rule in question. If the court thinks that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and wishes to evade it and help the regulation evolve, it could possibly hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts from the cases; some jurisdictions allow for a judge to recommend that an appeal be completed.
a hundred and fifteen . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance of the respondents that pensionary benefits could possibly be withheld on account of the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section twenty from the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does offer for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced. These contain if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may very well be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension could be withheld or reduced. In a few cases, a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set with the government.